fbpx
EPC Resource Library / Weekly Roundups

Environmental Polling Roundup – March 25th, 2022

HEADLINES

GOOD DATA POINTS TO HIGHLIGHT

FULL ROUNDUP

Climate Power + Data for Progress

Amid the current energy crisis, voters want more clean energy production and more accountability for fossil fuel companies (ReleaseTopline)

This new poll from Climate Power and Data for Progress shows that voters widely support increasing domestic clean energy production in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. These findings are very consistent with the poll released last week by Climate Power and LCV, which found that voters were responsive to arguments about the need to transition toward clean energy in order to provide America with more secure and stable energy that can’t be disrupted by dictators like Vladimir Putin. 

The Climate Power / Data for Progress poll finds that voters overwhelmingly support the federal government making investments to increase clean energy production in America in light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (69% support / 23% oppose), with majority support from voters of all party affiliations – including an 87%-7% margin among Democrats, a 66%-25% margin among independent voters, and a 54%-40% margin among Republicans.

Similar to the Climate Power / LCV poll from last week, this new poll also finds that voters believe criticisms of fossil fuel companies for profiteering off the crisis are valid: by a 75%-18% margin, voters agree more with the statement that “oil and gas companies should not use this moment to increase their profits and benefit their executives and other shareholders on Wall Street” than an opposing statement that “oil and gas companies still have to run a business and need to recover from the pandemic, which justifies their prices.”

Consistent with that sentiment, the poll finds that voters widely support “taxing the excessive profits of oil and gas companies” (63% support / 24% oppose) as one way to help keep energy prices under control and weaken a Russian economy that is heavily dependent on oil and gas exports. 

This idea to tax fossil fuel companies’ excessive profits also enjoys more support than opposition from voters of all party affiliations, further demonstrating how focusing on corporate polluters like oil and gas companies can be effective in creating a “common enemy” to rally partisans on both sides behind climate-friendly policies. 

POLITICO + Morning Consult

Voters are open to increasing domestic oil production, despite half supporting the declaration of climate change as a “national emergency” (ToplineCrosstabs)

This new national tracking poll from POLITICO and Morning Consult provides some sobering data about the way voters view the current energy crisis. 

The poll finds that voters are supportive of several proposals to increase the domestic supply of oil when they are framed as “methods for reducing gasoline prices”:

These data points demonstrate that voters view increasing domestic oil production as a sensible short-term solution to the energy crisis – even as many voters in the same poll say they support declaring climate change as a national emergency (51% support / 37% oppose) and banning fossil fuel drilling on federal land (39% support / 42% oppose).

As polls like this show, the idea of an “all-of-the-above” strategy to increase domestic energy production – including both clean energy and fossil fuels – is very appealing to the public. The attractiveness of this “all-of-the-above” approach makes it all the more important for climate advocates to make strong public arguments as to why doubling down on fossil fuels right now is a dangerous idea

In addition to the LCV / Climate Power deck linked above, we’ve been recommending this LCV / Climate Power poll memo and running Combined Defense Project compilation doc as good messaging resources for advocates who are trying to counter the arguments of the fossil fuel industry about gas prices and Russia’s invasion.

Walton Family Foundation + Morning Consult

Voters are more inclined to support political candidates whose environmental platforms include a focus on water-related issues like drought and flooding (ReleaseNational ToplineAZ ToplineCO Topline)

This new poll, conducted in advance of World Water Day, supports one of the common findings in environmental polling: clean water consistently ranks as one of the public’s very highest environmental concerns

The poll asked how urgent several water-related environmental priorities are, and majorities of voters say it is “very urgent” to provide access to clean, safe drinking water (59%), to protect oceans (53%), and to protect rivers, lakes, and streams (52%). 

The poll also found that voters link climate change to several water-related problems, including natural disasters like floods and droughts:

Additionally, the poll demonstrates that political candidates can benefit greatly from putting water issues front and center when they talk about climate change. In a split-sample experiment, just over half of voters say that they are more likely to vote for a candidate for federal office who “made addressing climate change a key part of the platform” (51% more likely to vote for this candidate / 17% less likely to vote for this candidate) while nearly two-thirds say they are more likely to vote for a candidate for federal office who “made addressing climate change and water-related environmental issues, like drought and flooding, a key part of their platform” (66% more likely to vote for this candidate / 12% less likely to vote for this candidate). 

As this finding illustrates, connecting climate change to the day-to-day environmental problems that concern most Americans (more than 70% of voters in the poll say they are at least “somewhat” concerned about drought, water scarcity, and extreme weather like hurricanes and tornadoes) can be a highly effective messaging tactic to raise the salience of climate change and make the public recognize it as a here-and-now problem rather than one to be dealt with in the future.

Related Resources