fbpx
EPC Resource Library / Weekly Roundups

Environmental Polling Roundup – March 24, 2023

HEADLINES

Data for ProgressVoters support the core climate and environmental provisions in President Biden’s proposed budget (Article, Crosstabs)

Climate Power – Voters disagree with the substance of Congressional Republicans’ H.R. 1 bill, as the public wants less reliance on fossil fuels and a faster transition to clean energy; oil company CEOs and “MAGA Republicans” are widely distrusted on energy issues (Memo)

Navigator – Voters overwhelmingly support stronger railroad oversight in the wake of the East Palestine disaster; voters are more likely to attribute higher gas prices to corporate greed than to environmental regulations (Release, Deck, Topline)

KEY TAKEAWAYS

GOOD DATA POINTS TO HIGHLIGHT

FULL ROUNDUP

Data for ProgressVoters support the core climate and environmental provisions in President Biden’s proposed budget (Article, Crosstabs)

New polling from Data for Progress finds that voters are more likely to support than oppose each of the core climate and environmental components of President Biden’s budget proposal, confirming what Morning Consult found last week about the broad popularity of the budget’s climate and clean energy provisions.

When voters are asked whether they’d prefer to keep or cut specific items from the budget, investments in clean energy and cutting plastic and air pollution are especially popular. Here is the full list of climate/environmental items tested in the survey, ranked by the percentages of voters who want to keep each item in the budget:

Partisanship naturally drives attitudes around these items in Biden’s proposed budget: at least 70% of Democrats say that they want to keep each item, while no items earn outright majority support from Republicans.

However, Republican voters are more amenable to certain climate/environmental provisions than others, and more Republicans say that they want to keep investments in American manufacturing of clean energy technologies in Biden’s budget (44%) than cut them (39%).

Last year, we saw messages and policies focused on U.S. manufacturing test very well in polling about the Inflation Reduction Act from LCV + Climate Power, Climate Power + Data for Progress, and POLITICO + Morning Consult. 

This new Data for Progress polling continues that trend, showing again that boosting American manufacturing is a compelling angle for President Biden’s clean energy plans – especially when communicating to more conservative audiences.

Climate Power – Voters disagree with the substance of Congressional Republicans’ H.R. 1 bill, as the public wants less reliance on fossil fuels and a faster transition to clean energy; oil company CEOs and “MAGA Republicans” are widely distrusted on energy issues (Memo)

New polling from Climate Power demonstrates that Congressional Republicans’ H.R. 1 energy bill, which seeks to undermine the clean energy transition both by incentivizing fossil fuel extraction and by rolling back clean energy investments, goes against the public’s priorities.

Climate Power finds that voters encourage the clean energy transition and want to see it sped up, not halted or reversed:

We should note that not everything in H.R. 1 is necessarily toxic from a public opinion standpoint if we let the bill’s supporters define it on their preferred terms. Polls have shown that the ideas of “permitting reform” and “streamlining” energy projects have inherent appeal to voters, and there’s also a strong public appetite for an “all-of-the-above” domestic energy approach that keeps some fossil fuels in the mix for a period of time. 

This makes it all the more important to counter opposition talking points that try to paint H.R. 1 as a common-sense solution to the country’s energy needs. The public needs to understand that the bill is:

  1. A threat to core environmental safeguards that protect our air and water from toxic pollution
  2. A gift to oil company CEOs, who are already reaping record profits, at the expense of everyday Americans, and 
  3. A major step backward in the transition to cleaner, more affordable energy

Oil company executives’ central role in pushing H.R. 1 is, in itself, a compelling argument against the package. Climate Power finds that 64% of voters don’t trust oil company CEOs on energy issues, making them one of the least trusted voices on energy policy. The majority of voters (59%) also say that they distrust “MAGA Republicans” on energy issues. 

Navigator – Voters overwhelmingly support stronger railroad oversight in the wake of the East Palestine disaster; voters are more likely to attribute higher gas prices to corporate greed than to environmental regulations (Release, Deck, Topline)

Consistent with previous polling we’ve seen on the East Palestine train derailment, Navigator finds that voters widely view the incident as a failure by Norfolk Southern and overwhelmingly support new policies to prevent similar disasters in the future.

When asked to choose who is most at fault for the train derailment from a list of possible causes, Navigator finds that voters are most likely to pin the blame on Norfolk Southern:

As we’ve seen in other polls, both Democrats and Republicans are more likely to blame Norfolk Southern than they are to blame their political adversaries – providing further evidence that the desire to hold corporate polluters accountable is one of the few environmental priorities that transcends partisanship

And in the wake of the East Palestine disaster, Navigator finds overwhelming support for legislation that has been proposed to prevent similar incidents in the future. Over three-quarters of voters (77% support / 9% oppose) say that they support a bipartisan bill to provide more oversight into railroad carriers and improve industry safety regulations, including majorities of Democrats (86%), independents (63%), and Republicans (73%).

The poll finds more ire directed at corporate polluters over gas prices, especially after voters learn about the record profits that oil companies have posted in the last year.

By a 14-point margin, voters are more likely to say that “corporations charging excessively high prices and price gouging” (49%) is the cause of high gas prices than “domestic policies, like environmental regulations, that are driving up costs” (35%).

In a split-sample experiment, half of poll respondents saw a statement about oil companies’ record profits before they were asked what they blame more for high gas prices. Those who were informed about oil companies’ record profits were 19 points more likely to blame high gas prices on corporations’ excessively high prices and price gouging (54%) than on domestic policies like environmental regulations (35%).

Related Resources