fbpx
EPC Resource Library / Weekly Roundups

Environmental Polling Roundup – January 20, 2023

HEADLINES

KEY TAKEAWAYS

GOOD DATA POINTS TO HIGHLIGHT

FULL ROUNDUP

Navigator

Voters continue to support the Inflation Reduction Act by overwhelming margins when they learn about it (Release, Deck, Topline)

The latest polling from Navigator reinforces a truism about the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA): when voters learn basics about what’s in the bill, they support it by large margins.

Here, voters support the legislation by a 43-point margin (66% support / 23% oppose) after reading the following description of it:

“As you may know, Biden and Democrats’ new legislation that has been passed by Congress is called the Inflation Reduction Act, which will give Medicare the power to negotiate lower drug prices, bring down health insurance premiums, and invest in clean energy like wind and solar power.”

Navigator finds that support for the IRA has increased slightly since they asked about the bill in November (43-point margin in favor, up from a 40-point margin in favor in November). The primary driver of this shift appears to be a softening of opposition among Republicans (three-point margin of opposition, down from a 12-point margin of opposition in November). 

The intuitive explanation here would be that Republican partisans are somewhat more willing to acknowledge the benefits of the IRA (and therefore give credit to Biden/Democrats) now that we’re no longer in an election year, but we need to see if this finding holds true in other polling before drawing any firm conclusions.

Navigator also finds that the share of the electorate that has heard at least “some” about the IRA (53%) hasn’t changed much since November (51%), confirming that at least half of the public still hasn’t really been informed about it. Accordingly, organizations that are communicating about the IRA should continue to operate under the assumption that general audiences have little to no real knowledge of it.

Walton Family Foundation + Morning Consult

Voters want the Farm Bill reauthorized with more environmental protections and incentives for sustainability (Release, Website, Report, Memo)

This polling was conducted in July, and we’re seeing it rolled out now as Congress gears up for negotiations over the Farm Bill.

The poll finds that voters overwhelmingly agree that it’s a priority for Congress to reauthorize the Farm Bill (82%), and large majorities also agree that the Farm Bill should be reauthorized with measures to increase sustainability and combat climate change. When the following policies are presented as possible elements of the reauthorized Farm Bill, majorities of voters support each one:

Additionally, voters overwhelmingly agree with notions that the government should encourage climate-friendly farming practices and that farmers have a responsibility to reduce the pollution of waterways:

[Michigan] EDF Action

Michigan voters are eager for climate action at the state level, and overwhelmingly support policies to guarantee clean water and protect communities of color (Release, Memo)

This newly released pre-election poll finds that Michigan voters are on board with the kind of bold climate action laid out in Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s MI Healthy Climate Plan.

Climate action and clean energy are broadly popular in the state:

Accordingly, specific policies to boost clean energy and combat climate pollution earn majority support:

Crucially, public support for the clean energy transition in Michigan is buoyed by notions that climate change is already impacting Michigan communities and that the clean energy transition will have positive impacts for the economy and consumers:

Consistent with other environmental polling, EDF Action’s polling in Michigan finds that clean water protections are a universally-shared priority:

And in a state where, like many places, clean water and environmental justice are inextricably linked, the poll additionally finds that voters widely agree on the importance of devoting special focus in the clean energy transition to communities that have historically borne the brunt of pollution:

[Mayors] Boston University Menino Survey of Mayors

Mayors across the country are worried about climate impacts in their cities and agree that cities have a major role to play in addressing the climate crisis, but they are reluctant to put bans or restrictions on individual behaviors (Release, Report)

This survey draws on responses from 118 of the 501 mayors governing U.S. cities with populations greater than 75,000. While the small sample makes the results more qualitative than a typical poll, they still provide a rare level of insight into the beliefs and motivations of policymakers.

The sample also includes a good amount of partisan diversity: Democratic mayors make up 64% of respondents, Republican mayors make up 18%, and mayors with no party affiliation also make up 18%.

The survey finds that mayors overwhelmingly acknowledge human-caused climate change, regardless of their party affiliation: 90% agree that increases in the Earth’s temperature over the last century are due more to the effects of human activities than natural changes, including 95% of Democratic mayors and 71% of Republican mayors.

Most mayors also worry about climate change impacting their cities, with majorities saying they worry about drought (60%), extreme heat (58%), flooding (57%), and air pollution (56%) in their cities.

Concerns about specific climate impacts naturally vary by geography, with mayors in the Western U.S. most concerned about drought (80%) and fires (78%), mayors in the Midwest (76%) and South (68%) most concerned about flooding, and mayors in the Northeast most concerned about extreme heat (79%).

Consistent with their concerns about climate impacts, mayors feel that cities have a major role to play in combating climate change: nearly three-quarters (73%) agree that cities should “play a strong role in reducing the effects of climate change, even if it means sacrificing revenues and/or expending financial resources.”

Most mayors (55%) also agree that “[their] city’s residents will have to make real sacrifices” in order for their city to make real progress on climate issues. However, when it comes to the specific levers that cities can use to reduce climate pollution, there’s a clear preference among mayors to exert their influence over building codes and zoning policy than to restrict personal choices or consumer behaviors.

When asked to choose the two “most powerful tools” their city government can use that relate to climate change, mayors are most likely to name their influence over building codes (55%) and influence over zoning (38%). Relatively fewer cite their ability to persuade the public (25%), influence over city energy procurement (21%), control over streets and sidewalks (14%), ability to subsidize behaviors (11%), or influence over other city procurement (9%). Just 8% count their authority to ban or limit behaviors among their most powerful tools to deal with climate change.

And when it comes to specific policies to reduce emissions, more than three-quarters of mayors say they support systemic changes such as replacing municipal vehicles with more fuel efficient versions, requiring that new construction be solar-ready, and procuring more clean electricity through community choice aggregation. Most mayors are also in favor of using local government money to subsidize private home energy upgrades.

However, mayors are relatively less likely to support policies that target households or individuals. Only around half of mayors say they support restrictions on gas or oil heat in new private construction or restrictions on gas powered lawn tools, and most do not support actions to make driving more expensive (e.g., congestion fees or parking prices) or restrictions on gas stoves in private homes.

Related Resources