fbpx
EPC Resource Library / Weekly Roundups

Environmental Polling Roundup – December 6, 2024

Headlines

Key Takeaways

Good Data Points to Highlight

Full Roundup

Americans have grown more concerned about climate change since before the election. ecoAmerica surveyed adults nationwide in June and then again in the days after the election (November 7-9). Between the two surveys, the share of Americans who are at least “somewhat” concerned about climate change grew by five points (72%, up from 67%).

Additionally, the percentage who are “very” concerned about climate change has increased by six points (40%, up from 34%).

As climate change and environmental issues have grown more polarized in the last two decades, we’ve tended to see rises in concern about climate and the environment in response to Republican electoral victories and decreases in concern in response to Democratic electoral victories. While we’ll need more data to draw any firm conclusions about how environmental attitudes are shifting in response to Trump’s recent victory, these early data points are consistent with the kind of heightened concern we would expect under a Republican administration.

Increases in climate concern have mostly come among independents and Republicans, while Democrats’ concerns have also intensified. Overall climate concern among independents has increased by nine points since June (69% at least “somewhat” concerned, up from 60%), and concern among Republicans has increased by four points (56% at least “somewhat” concerned, up from 52%).

Additionally, while a steady 88% of Democrats reported being at least “somewhat” concerned about climate change in ecoAmerica’s June and November surveys, concerns among Democrats have intensified. Nearly three-fifths of Democrats (59%) now say that they are “very” concerned about the issue, an increase of nine points since June (50%).

Many Americans tie their increased climate concerns directly to the election. Around half of Americans (45%) say that the election results increased their concerns about climate change, while hardly any (5%) say that the election results made them less concerned about the issue.

The large majority of Democrats (68%) say that they have become more concerned about climate change as a result of the election, including more than two in five (43%) who say that their climate concern has increased “a lot” as a result of the election. 

Meanwhile, two in five independents (40%) and about one-quarter of Republicans (24%) also say that the election results made them more concerned about climate change.

Most Trump voters are concerned about climate change. The data that we have so far about Trump’s winning coalition indicates that they have diverse views on climate change, and generally don’t share Trump’s dismissiveness about the problem. The Fox News Voter Analysis, for example, found that Trump won overwhelmingly among voters who aren’t concerned about climate change but also won 44% of voters who are “somewhat” concerned about the problem.

Here, ecoAmerica finds that the majority of Trump voters (55%) express at least “some” concern about climate change. Trump voters are also just as likely to say that they’re “very” concerned about climate change (23%) as to say that they aren’t “at all” concerned (22%) about it.

Voters who participated in the election side more with arguments in favor of clean energy than arguments in favor of fossil fuel production. Surveying 5,000 voters from October 31 – November 9 who either had already voted or planned to vote in the election, Navigator found that most prioritize clean energy over fossil fuel production.

By a 55%-45% margin, voters are more likely to side with a pro-clean energy argument (“we should be investing in more affordable, cleaner energy production in order to create clean energy jobs here at home, bring down energy costs, and reduce our reliance on big oil companies”) than a pro-fossil fuel argument (“we should be focused on making the U.S. the number one producer of oil and natural gas in the world, instead of supporting extreme ideas like banning fracking and banning gas vehicles”).

Voters who were persuadable in the election were even more likely to favor clean energy over fossil fuels. Swing voters (defined as those who did not rule out voting for either Harris or Trump from the start of the candidates’ campaigns) side more with the argument in favor of clean energy by a 14-point margin, which is even wider than the 10-point margin that Navigator found among the overall electorate.

Navigator’s findings are very consistent with other post-election polls such as the Fox News Voter Analysis, which found that voters were 12 points more likely to agree that the country should focus on expanding the use of clean energy such as wind and solar (55%) than to agree that the country should focus on expanding the production of fossil fuels such as oil and gas (43%).

Related Resources